Who wants to kill Nevada’s Anti-SLAPP statute?

I live in California, so why do I care if you Nevadans lose your free speech rights and I drive business away from you?

I live in California, so why do I care if you stupid Nevadans lose your free speech rights and I drive business away from you?


Well, it looks like we know who pushed to kill Nevada’s Anti-SLAPP statute.

Video here.

And why?

Because he got the Pwned while representing Steve Wynn in California. Here’s the loss.

5 Responses to Who wants to kill Nevada’s Anti-SLAPP statute?

  1. No, Marc, don’t you see? The problem with NRS 41.635 *et seq.* is that it actually does something that couldn’t already be done with NRCP 12(b)(5). It’s fine that we give greater scrutiny to claims targeting speech than claim that don’t target speech, so long as we don’t give them any greater scrutiny than claims that don’t target speech. Doesn’t that make sense? We’re protecting speech by making sure we don’t protect it any more than any other activity!

  2. Ian Bagger says:

    Well researched, counselor.

  3. Wooooooow.

    That Order would have hurt less if the Judge had just set the guy on actual fire.

  4. […] on his blog, Marc Randazza points the finger at a different Las Vegas casino-owning billionaire: Steve Wynn, arguing that Wynn also just lost a defamation lawsuit, thanks to California’s anti-SLAPP […]

%d bloggers like this: