“Would there be any freedom of press or speech if one must reduce his vocabulary to vapid innocuous euphemisms?”
-Judge Clayton Horn in ruling that Allen Ginsburg’s poem, Howl, was not legally obscene.
The Legal Satyricon
Occasionally irreverent thoughts on law, liberty, tech, and politics
Subscribe / Terms of Use
Subscribe to the Legal Satyricon
By Email
By RSS Feed
Become a fan on Facebook
Follow me on Twitter
You must read this prior to any use of this site whatsoever.
Terms & Conditions of Use and Legal Information (last updated August 4, 2009)The Satyricon Roll
Sexual Intelligence
Underdog Blog
Meeting the Sin Laws
TTABlog
Seattle Trademark Lawyer
Trademark Blog
Media Law
Law of the Land
Dillsnap Cogitations
Above the Law
Adams Drafting
Spam Notes
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
WindyPundit
Nobody's Business
Simple Justice
Build a Solo Practice
New York Personal Injury Law Blog
Pope Hat
Tatiana Von Tauber
Citizen Media Project
Tech & Marketing Blog
What About Clients?
A Public Defender
Defending People
Likelihood of Confusion
ContiFazz
Defend My Domain
Dispatches From the Culture Wars
Siouxsie Law
Mockler Family Law
Crime & Federalism
The Spearhead
Not Guilty
In Mala Fide
Shit!!! Planet!!!-
angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the
starry dynamo in the machinery of night,
…
who let themselves be fucked in the ass by saintly motorcyclists, and
screamed with joy
This is worth reading for the full story (don’t want to link to it): Howl on Trial: The Battle for Free Expression by Bill Morgan and Nancy Peters (City Lights)