By J. DeVoy
After six years of teasing, ICANN finally delivers on a .xxx top-level domain for sites displaying adult content.
The domains, which will be available by 2011, already have 110,000 pre-registrations through ICM Registry.
By J. DeVoy
After six years of teasing, ICANN finally delivers on a .xxx top-level domain for sites displaying adult content.
The domains, which will be available by 2011, already have 110,000 pre-registrations through ICM Registry.
This entry was posted on Friday, June 25th, 2010 at 12:50 pm and is filed under adult entertainment trademarks, domain names, internet law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
By RSS Feed
Sexual Intelligence
Underdog Blog
Meeting the Sin Laws
TTABlog
Seattle Trademark Lawyer
Trademark Blog
Media Law
Law of the Land
Dillsnap Cogitations
Above the Law
Adams Drafting
Spam Notes
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
WindyPundit
Nobody's Business
Simple Justice
Build a Solo Practice
New York Personal Injury Law Blog
Pope Hat
Tatiana Von Tauber
Citizen Media Project
Tech & Marketing Blog
What About Clients?
A Public Defender
Defending People
Likelihood of Confusion
ContiFazz
Defend My Domain
Dispatches From the Culture Wars
Siouxsie Law
Mockler Family Law
Crime & Federalism
The Spearhead
Not Guilty
In Mala Fide
Shit!!! Planet!!!
Theme: Contempt by Vault9.
Blog at WordPress.com.
But can I display non-pornographic content on a XXX domain?
Wish I knew just what’s ACTUALLY happening. Here’s the first two paragraphs of a press release from the adult trade association, Free Speech Coalition:
<>
Oops; my quote didn’t post:
Internet regulatory organization ICANN’s Board of Directors today passed a resolution that instructs the staff to reassess the merits of ICM Registry’s application to run .XXX as a sTLD, but serious obstacles to its ultimate passage still exist, and several Board members expressed deep reservations at having to vote on a resolution they did not consider completely accurate.
Essentially, the Board resolved that, although they had not made a determination as to whether they agreed with the findings of the majority of the independent review panel, they would accept and act in accordance with some of the panel’s findings.
That’s worse than a lot of the jargon-laden international human rights stuff I’ve seen the UN publish. The CNN article was somewhat vague about implementation as well. Now I can see why.