- Anthony Ciolli of AutoAdmit Takes the Offensive
- Ciolli Sues Yale Law Students in AutoAdmit Scandal
- AutoAdmit defendant sues Yalies
UPDATE: On another post, someone asked the following question:
What do you think of the fact that your former client is now suing the attorney and plaintiffs who sued him? I note you did not sign that complaint. Just curious.
My answer to that seems relevant here:
I personally believe that Mr. Ciolli’s suit has merit. I am not licensed in PA, thus my understanding of the PA-specific claims is not exactly highly-educated. Nevertheless, from what I have read, his claims have a strong likelihood of success.
I never understood why Mr. Ciolli was a defendant in the initial action. I’m not sure that the plaintiffs did either. It always seemed to me that they were more interested in hurting Mr. Ciolli and/or holding him hostage in order to extract concessions from Mr. Cohen (the owner of AutoAdmit) than they were interested in vindicating any real legal interests. I personally would have turned in my law license before signing the complaint in Doe v. Ciolli.
As far as me not signing Ciolli’s complaint, yes, that’s true. I am not representing Mr. Ciolli in this matter. The fact that I am not participating in that matter should not imply that I don’t think that it has merit. The PA claims are beyond my expertise, and thus on that front I would lend little to the team.
Just as importantly, I am first and foremost a First Amendment attorney. Accordingly, while I could possibly have brought a lot to the table on the defamation and false light counts, I can’t bring myself to be counsel in a plaintiff-side defamation action — no matter how meritorious the case. That would place me in a position of having to balance the best interests of my client with the best interests of the Constitution. I am sworn to uphold and defend that document, and when I took that oath, I meant it with every bit of blood coursing through my heart.
Bottom line, I love my country more than I love my clients — so when those interests have the slightest potential to come into conflict, my country wins. I must, therefore, often turn down very strong, potentially profitable, and justified plaintiff’s side defamation actions.
I would, however, like to see Mr. Ciolli vindicated. What has happened to him was wrong, and I support him in his quest for justice. I just can’t be the man carrying the sword.
Here is the Complaint in Ciolli v. Iravani, Heller, et. al..

By RSS Feed
That title…god damn awesome.
An honorary 180, if I may say so myself.
Long Live GTO!
180!
Randazza = teh l33t
You, sir, are awesome!
EVERYBODY DANCE NOW
[...] attorneys representing Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani in the AutoAdmit suit, – and a defendant in Anthony Ciolli’s countersuit — a case that the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has allowed to go forward – in [...]