This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 1st, 2006 at 1:30 pm and is filed under First Amendment, video game law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
The Legal Satyricon
Occasionally irreverent thoughts on law, liberty, tech, and politics.
Subscribe / Terms of Use
Subscribe to the Legal Satyricon
By Email
By RSS Feed
Randazza Legal Group on Facebook
Follow me on Twitter
You must read this prior to any use of this site whatsoever.
Terms & Conditions of Use and Legal Information (last updated Last Modified: September 27, 2015)The Satyricon Roll
Sexual Intelligence
Underdog Blog
Meeting the Sin Laws
TTABlog
Seattle Trademark Lawyer
Trademark Blog
Media Law
Law of the Land
Dillsnap Cogitations
Above the Law
Adams Drafting
Spam Notes
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
WindyPundit
Nobody's Business
Simple Justice
Build a Solo Practice
New York Personal Injury Law Blog
Pope Hat
Tatiana Von Tauber
Citizen Media Project
Tech & Marketing Blog
What About Clients?
A Public Defender
Defending People
Likelihood of Confusion
ContiFazz
Defend My Domain
Dispatches From the Culture Wars
Siouxsie Law
Mockler Family Law
Crime & Federalism
The Spearhead
Not Guilty
In Mala Fide
Shit!!! Planet!!!-
The Legal Satyricon 
Reason vs. Emotion. You knew you were gonna lose this argument when you started. But I agree with you.
… And I really don’t want anyone copying broad sections of the Bible. Neither does this Fox News anchor, would she understand the content of Deuteronomy or Leviticus.
As was customary in September 2006, the Jack Thompson myth continued to spread about the tenuous relationship between Kimveer Gill and his “favorite video game.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimveer_Gill#Video_games
Nevermind that it was a myth; it was the perfect myth to leverage against a game critical of the myth itself.