Indiana Principal Smacked Down!

An Indiana juvenile court judge held that a juvenile who posted expletives about her high school principal on someone else’s myspace page had not only violated the State anti-harassment statute, but that her comments were legally obscene. Check out this little gem from the lower court.

The [juvenile court] finds that the words “Fuck Mr. Gobert” and “Hey you piece of Greencastle shit what the fuck do you think of me now that you can’t control me? Huh? Ha ha ha guess what I’ll wear my fucking piercings all day long and to school and you can’t do shit about it. Ha ha fucking ha! Stupid bastard” is obscene. As the well known U.S. Supreme Court decision “One knows Pornography when one sees it,” this [c]ourt finds that such language is obscene in the context used by [A.B.]. [A.B.] was not exercising her constituted rights of free speech in such a tirade – but to use the most vulgar language she could. Moreover she was not expressing her opinion in her writing.

So the juvenile court cited to “the well known U.S. Supreme Court decision” but apparently forgot all about Miller v. California?

Fortunately, the Indiana Court of Appeals knows its Constitutional law and reversed and remanded. However, they went even further than that. The Court of Appeals held that the student’s postings were protected political speech! I do agree, but I am both stunned and delighted that the Court held as such.

The case is available here.

You gotta love this little gem from the kid:

Hey you piece of greencastle shit.
What the fuck do you think of me [now] that you can[‘t] control me? Huh? Ha ha ha guess what I’ll wear my fucking piercings all day long and to school and you can[‘t] do shit about it! Ha ha fucking ha! Stupid bastard! Oh and kudos to whomever made this ([I’m] pretty sure I know who). Get a background.

I can’t wait to use that in a brief one day. See AB v. State, 863 N.E.2d 1212, 1214 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (“Ha ha fucking ha! Stupid bastard!”).

4 Responses to Indiana Principal Smacked Down!

  1. eleventyurple says:

    Oh that is truly wonderful. Made my day.

  2. […] Indiana Principal Smacked Down. Same as above, read the posting as well as the case (its only 7 pages) […]

  3. Doing some research on this topic for another class, the 1st Amendment and Privacy seems to be a topic of great debate with dealings on MySpace. Another case that is being litigated right now is going on in a high school in Hermitage, Penn. Where a student was suspended in 2006 for creating one of several MySpace profiles of the school’s principal, not only criticizing the principal, but making claims that he was a sex offender, abused women, and abused drugs among other things. The incident involved four students but when one of them was suspended his parents filed a federal lawsuit claiming a violation of his First Amendment right. The Principal has also commenced litigation against those students alleging defamation. MySpace is not MySpace anymore, but is OURSPACE, where the information that you post may most likely have repercussions that you might have over looked when you deceided to place something in cyberspace.
    The topic that attracted my interest involved the question of jurisdiction, not only over the parties but over the action. These claims have issues concerning third party liability, defamation, jurisdiction within the internet , and generally applicable civil and criminal laws concerning the damages that occur, saying the principal is bad is not actionable, but saying he is a sex offender and if it’s false, could be sufficient to be liable for libel.

    http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6174506.html

    If you would like to read more about Privacy and MySpace, look at my page for a funny little paper on OURSPACE.(KimandArvin EC Blog)

    Arvind Galabya

  4. […] What is it with the Indiana schools? Is it just coincidence, or is Indiana trying to be Hoosier Stat…? […]