This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 29th, 2011 at 11:38 pm and is filed under copyright, imbeciles. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
I would add that Righthaven’s counsel has admitted to a violation (if not hundreds) of Rule 11, in that he failed to conduct the “inquiry reasonable under the circumstances” to confirm that his factual allegations have evidentiary support.
They’re running a mill, and he admitted that the mill lacks the required safeguards.
Yes, I am their attorney – and I agree that “You imbecile” went through my mind as I read Masnick’s piece. Too bad that Mike doesn’t do his homework, eh?
I would add that Righthaven’s counsel has admitted to a violation (if not hundreds) of Rule 11, in that he failed to conduct the “inquiry reasonable under the circumstances” to confirm that his factual allegations have evidentiary support.
They’re running a mill, and he admitted that the mill lacks the required safeguards.
I hope that Conde Nast has the stones to send their legal bill to those fuckers — even if it’s only $100.
Funny… “You imbecile” is also what came to my mind as I read this story about Corbin Fischer.
You’re not still General Counsel for those idiots, are you, Randazza?
I fail to see how Corbin Fischer is not as nefarious as Righthaven.
Yes, I am their attorney – and I agree that “You imbecile” went through my mind as I read Masnick’s piece. Too bad that Mike doesn’t do his homework, eh?