Without discussing the merits or demerits of the death penalty, can we all agree that “life saver” is not the term you use to describe someone who supplies you with sodium thiopental? (Sodium thiopental is the drug you administer in a lethal injection execution). (source)
The Legal Satyricon
Occasionally irreverent thoughts on law, liberty, tech, and politics
Subscribe / Terms of Use
Subscribe to the Legal Satyricon
By Email
By RSS Feed
Become a fan on Facebook
Follow me on Twitter
You must read this prior to any use of this site whatsoever.
Terms & Conditions of Use and Legal Information (last updated August 4, 2009)The Satyricon Roll
Sexual Intelligence
Underdog Blog
Meeting the Sin Laws
TTABlog
Seattle Trademark Lawyer
Trademark Blog
Media Law
Law of the Land
Dillsnap Cogitations
Above the Law
Adams Drafting
Spam Notes
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
WindyPundit
Nobody's Business
Simple Justice
Build a Solo Practice
New York Personal Injury Law Blog
Pope Hat
Tatiana Von Tauber
Citizen Media Project
Tech & Marketing Blog
What About Clients?
A Public Defender
Defending People
Likelihood of Confusion
ContiFazz
Defend My Domain
Dispatches From the Culture Wars
Siouxsie Law
Mockler Family Law
Crime & Federalism
The Spearhead
Not Guilty
In Mala Fide
Shit!!! Planet!!!-
Well Marc it depends how much the person supplies. I would pay for a nonfatal dose, since prescription barbiturates used to be my favorite drug. Supposedly you can still buy them in Mexico if you claim that you are a veterinarian. They are also a drug of choice for people who want to kill themselves without risk of waking up in an emergency room with half one’s brain functions fried.
I realize this is totally irrelevant to your post.