New-age book burnings all the rage in Buffalo, New York

By J. DeVoy

Buffalo, New York, was in the international headlines a little over a week ago for a shooting that occurred at a downtown bar, the City Grill, that left 4 dead and another 4 wounded.  As city residents can attest, this came as a surprise because the City Grill is off Buffalo’s beaten path for violent nightlife, and is a relatively upscale venue dominated by yuppies and their familiars during the week.  While a suspect was initially apprehended, he was later released because the highly trained Buffalo Police mistook his identity.

The initial headlines indicated that the venue was in use for an anniversary party.  As time went on and further investigation occurred, though, the media discovered that these parties were a weekly occurrence – the issue initially was confused because one of the victims was celebrating his one-year anniversary.

Yesterday, The Buffalo News had the balls gross insensitivity to point out in its front page headline that 7 of the 8 shooting victims had a criminal record.  While these are uncomfortable facts, The Buffalo News’ Editor and Vice President, Margaret Sullivan, unapologetically described the information as “an important piece of the puzzle as our community tries to understand and explore why it happened.”

But that was then, and this – 24 scant hours later – is now.

Angry residents staged a burning of the Buffalo News Monday, protesting an article detailing the criminal histories of several of the Main Street shooting victims.

Protesters said Sunday’s story about the backgrounds of those shot was “disrespectful” to the victims’ and their families. (source.)

While the victims’ criminal records could have been presented in a more tasteful way, there was no onus on the News to protect the feelings of the people who earned them.  The protestors would like outsiders to believe – and maybe even believe themselves – that there is some cruel fairy who dispenses criminal charges amongst the population and one is merely unlucky to become a felon, or that some computer glitch causes these entries to be made in the files of unsuspecting individuals.  Reality check: If you have a criminal record, you earned it – even if you were just a victim of circumstance or “in the wrong place at the wrong time.”  Prosecutors, though tough, aren’t monsters…at least not in Erie County.

More troubling is the gestapo-like language interfering with facts.  The Buffalo News was “disrespectful.”  People are “angry.”  So, naturally, the general public following the story should be denied information about it.

More than a dozen protesters burned copies of the Buffalo News and urged people to boycott the paper. They also demanded that those who were responsible for the article be fired.

Fortunately, the demonstration doesn’t seem to be widespread.  But calling for the firing of people over spreading information?  Print journalists, no less – not exactly a booming industry – and in THIS economy?  Ironically, the protestors have put the shoe on the other foot without realizing it.

They also claimed the article was racist.

The shaming language reaches its inevitable crescendo.  Admittedly, all of the victims in the shooting were African American.  But pointing out that 7 out of 8 of them had a criminal history, potentially linking them with Buffalo’s well documented system of gangs and rivalries, does not a racist statement make.

The image of book burning is a powerful one, as it is a tactic that has been used for centuries by tyrants and oppressive groups to obliterate the foundation for any ideas harmful to their rule.  In modern America, the image is most closely associated with Nazism and Christianity (normally with respect to Beatles albums in protest of John Lennon’s statements about being larger than Jesus), but it has happened more recently in Iraq, Cuba and Bosnia-Herzegovina.  While a protected form of speech, it is among the least intelligent; though it demonstrates disapproval of a message, it seeks to destroy information rather than repudiate or disprove it.  In civil proceedings, this kind of conduct tends to prove that the evidence’s contents were not only true, but damaging.

The African American community in Buffalo should be mad, for a lot of reasons.  The area’s job growth is virtually nonexistent, and what little there is tends to occur in the inaccessible suburbs.  The area’s people by in large have given up on the city and, by extension, its residents.  There is an endless supply of reasons to protest and demand the attention of the media and public, but the method for doing this is important.  Actually destroying the controversial information – even in effigy, as its out on the internet and memorialized in this blog forevermore – is perhaps the disconcerting and least effective way of achieving that goal.

2 Responses to New-age book burnings all the rage in Buffalo, New York

  1. Halcyon 2L says:

    The racial tension in upstate, especially in Western NY, is omfgcrazy deep. This area is not like Massachusetts or Connecticut or downstate. The article probably *was* a maneuver to indirectly appeal to racist sympathies that are really rampant upstate–a palliative suggesting it’s less bad that these people died in our community because they were bad and black.

    They didn’t burn a library, man. They burned some newspapers because they were pissed off. Hell I do that to get my camp fires going. It’s not like they actually burned *books*–a starker image, invoking Fahrenheit 451 and all the symbolism you cite.

    I think burning a newspaper is, well, inflammatory symbolic speech–not entirely unlike burning a flag. I think it’s curious that you denounce this speech because it denounces other speech. Their act was symbolic censure, not censorship, which would have been impossible (as you point out). They expressed anger at an indignity.

    What’s wrong with their speech again? Doesn’t the Marketplace of Ideas cure your fears?

  2. Ernie Menard says:

    I agree with the other commenter, in part, that the act of burning the newspapers was merely symbolic. However, the protesters did cross the line into attempted censorship by demanding the termination of the journalists and further by attempting to intiate a boycott of the newspaper.

    Reality check on Reality Check:
    “Reality check: If you have a criminal record, you earned it – even if you were just a victim of circumstance or “in the wrong place at the wrong time.”” I totally disagree with the absolute ‘you earned it.’ Every guy that walked out off death row as an innocent man had an undeserved criminal record for the crime which put them on death row.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 465 other followers