The California Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional amendment (known as Prop 8) passed by California voters last November — changing the state’s constitution to provide that you can’t get married if you’ve got matching nasty bits. The challenge to Prop 8 had been brought on the theory that it was really an unlawful revision of the state’s constitution, as opposed to an amendment. A tough sell by pretty much everyone’s estimation. However, the court did rule that gay couples already married in California prior to the vote approving Prop 8 would remain legally married. Californians can expect to see referendums to repeal the ban on every future statewide ballot.
By RSS Feed
May 27, 2009 at 6:00 pm |
Iowa: more forward-thinking than California.
May 27, 2009 at 6:07 pm |
comment deleted due to asshattery -MJR
May 27, 2009 at 6:15 pm |
Right?!?! (to the first comment, not the daily show bit)
July 5, 2009 at 9:50 pm |
What’s the point in upholding Prop 8 but allowing already married gays to stay married? Won’t that cause them problems?
Jim and Steve Smith, are you brothers?
“No.”
Relations, then?
“We’re married.”
Isn’t gay marriage illegal?
“We were married before, so it was grandfathered in…”
Seems like it would create undue awkwardness and create a big opening for potential discrimination.