A few days ago, I wrote a post on “Intentional Sex Torts.” This created some high pitched shrieking that I hadn’t actually read the article. The article is here, and it is worse than I thought.
However, I did find some good scholarship on this issue. Adult Impersonation: Rape by Fraud as a Defense to Statutory Rape. I don’t agree with this paper’s conclusions, but the analysis of “rape by fraud” is far more reasonable and well researched than the Intentional Sex Torts article.
By Email
By RSS Feed
Sexual IntelligenceUnderdog BlogMeeting the Sin LawsTTABlogSeattle Trademark LawyerTrademark BlogMedia LawMass. Law BlogLaw of the LandDillsnap CogitationsAbove the LawAdams Drafting Spam NotesLas Vegas Trademark AttorneyWindyPunditNobody's BusinessSimple JusticeBuild a Solo PracticeNew York Personal Injury Law BlogPope HatTatiana Von TauberQuizLawCitizen Media ProjectTech & Marketing BlogAndrew SullivanWhat About Clients?A Public DefenderDefending People
marcorandazza
Tara Warrington
blevinsj
AGhostInTheSnow
Christopher Harbin
jesschristensen
Tatiana
Bob
jfischer1975
smoconnor
mattcsanchez
tarakirstenk
May 9, 2008 at 1:04 pm |
Having just checked SSRN, there have been a grand total of 8 downloads, and I know who 3 of them are. My conclusion, then, is that this is an article of little to no interest. Apparently, not even the other feminist law professors can be bothered to read it.
May 9, 2008 at 1:17 pm |
Too bad. It *should* be of interest. You can’t fight bad ideas unless you are familiar with them.