<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York steps up to the plate - passes &#8220;Libel Terrorism Protection Act&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/new-york-steps-up-to-the-plate-passes-libel-terrorism-protection-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/new-york-steps-up-to-the-plate-passes-libel-terrorism-protection-act/</link>
	<description>Occasionally Irreverent Thoughts on Law, Tech, and Politics by Prof. Marc J. Randazza and the Satyriconistas</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: marcorandazza</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/new-york-steps-up-to-the-plate-passes-libel-terrorism-protection-act/#comment-6004</link>
		<dc:creator>marcorandazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=928#comment-6004</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Me and my silly desire to wax poetic.  I've corrected the error.  Thank you. &lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Me and my silly desire to wax poetic.  I&#8217;ve corrected the error.  Thank you. </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrie</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/new-york-steps-up-to-the-plate-passes-libel-terrorism-protection-act/#comment-5997</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=928#comment-5997</guid>
		<description>Actually, England had a Bill of Rights before America did. It's part of WHY we have a one. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/england.htm

It's just that their "freedom of speech" clause is about government, not the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, England had a Bill of Rights before America did. It&#8217;s part of WHY we have a one. <a href="http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/england.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/england.htm</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s just that their &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; clause is about government, not the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
