<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Commish Tate &#8212; Asshat of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>Occasionally irreverent thoughts on law, liberty, tech, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Stross - Michigan Mural Case Update &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-7890</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Stross - Michigan Mural Case Update &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-7890</guid>
		<description>[...] because the Michigan Court of Appeals understands anatomy to a greater extent than Kevin Martin or Deborah Taylor-Tate (they think that the buttocks are a sexual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] because the Michigan Court of Appeals understands anatomy to a greater extent than Kevin Martin or Deborah Taylor-Tate (they think that the buttocks are a sexual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Irvine</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>M Irvine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>with regards to the first post, what&#039;s wrong with full frontal nudity? please stay out of my household. I promise to stay out of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with regards to the first post, what&#8217;s wrong with full frontal nudity? please stay out of my household. I promise to stay out of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Gets Punked Again &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-6879</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Gets Punked Again &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-6879</guid>
		<description>[...] to me as a First Amendment advocate, but it also has the right tone when considered in light of Deborah Taylor Tate’s recent statement that “the law is simple. If a broadcaster makes the decision to show indecent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to me as a First Amendment advocate, but it also has the right tone when considered in light of Deborah Taylor Tate’s recent statement that “the law is simple. If a broadcaster makes the decision to show indecent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Arndt</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4988</link>
		<dc:creator>George Arndt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4988</guid>
		<description>The FCC only regulates broadcast TV and radio, both which are in decline. Anyone with an internet or cable connections can see a LOT of nudity and foul language. The FCC is a paper tiger in the end. They are completely out of touch with new trends in culture. The attitudes about sexuality and nudity in the US are becoming more like Europe’s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC only regulates broadcast TV and radio, both which are in decline. Anyone with an internet or cable connections can see a LOT of nudity and foul language. The FCC is a paper tiger in the end. They are completely out of touch with new trends in culture. The attitudes about sexuality and nudity in the US are becoming more like Europe’s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYPD Blue Update &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4793</link>
		<dc:creator>NYPD Blue Update &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4793</guid>
		<description>[...] Blue&#160;Update  An update to my post, FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week (which has, itself been updated) here is the scene that got ABC a $1.4 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blue&nbsp;Update  An update to my post, FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week (which has, itself been updated) here is the scene that got ABC a $1.4 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Nichol - First Amendment Bad Ass &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4768</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Nichol - First Amendment Bad Ass &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4768</guid>
		<description>[...] only Deborah Taylor Tate, Sam Brownback, and a certain uptight trademark examiner (who will not be named during ongoing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only Deborah Taylor Tate, Sam Brownback, and a certain uptight trademark examiner (who will not be named during ongoing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcorandazza</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>marcorandazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Do I need to draw you a picture?  

Have someone take a picture of your ass.  See the fleshy parts?  Those are your &lt;i&gt;buttocks&lt;/i&gt;.  The little hole where the poop comes out is the &lt;i&gt;anus&lt;/i&gt;.  If you wish to consider the anus to be a sexual organ, I suppose that there is an argument in your favor.  The buttocks are as much a sexual organ as the biceps.   

Naturally, I presume that Ms. Taylor Tate and the Kansas board of education would say that this is only a theory.

And why do I use &quot;asshat?&quot;  Asshat and asshole are not synonymous, asshole.  

-MJR&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Do I need to draw you a picture?  </p>
<p>Have someone take a picture of your ass.  See the fleshy parts?  Those are your <i>buttocks</i>.  The little hole where the poop comes out is the <i>anus</i>.  If you wish to consider the anus to be a sexual organ, I suppose that there is an argument in your favor.  The buttocks are as much a sexual organ as the biceps.   </p>
<p>Naturally, I presume that Ms. Taylor Tate and the Kansas board of education would say that this is only a theory.</p>
<p>And why do I use &#8220;asshat?&#8221;  Asshat and asshole are not synonymous, asshole.  </p>
<p>-MJR</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbk</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4737</link>
		<dc:creator>sbk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4737</guid>
		<description>With the acceptance of homosexuality by the American culture how is it that the &quot;buttocks&quot; are NOT a sexual organ?  My dictionary uses &quot;anus&quot; as a synonym for &quot;butt.&quot;  

It also begs the question if the human asshole is so unoffense to the public, why do you use the term &quot;Asshat?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the acceptance of homosexuality by the American culture how is it that the &#8220;buttocks&#8221; are NOT a sexual organ?  My dictionary uses &#8220;anus&#8221; as a synonym for &#8220;butt.&#8221;  </p>
<p>It also begs the question if the human asshole is so unoffense to the public, why do you use the term &#8220;Asshat?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Proposes Fine of $1.4 Mil for Showing Buttocks &#171; Entertainment Law</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Proposes Fine of $1.4 Mil for Showing Buttocks &#171; Entertainment Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>[...] also, my other good buddy Marco Randazza&#8217;s post here.     Posted by ajcontiguglia Filed in First [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also, my other good buddy Marco Randazza&#8217;s post here.     Posted by ajcontiguglia Filed in First [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcorandazza</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator>marcorandazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4719</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Of course, she is an evil little fascist... I just didn&#039;t want people to lose sight of that.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Of course, she is an evil little fascist&#8230; I just didn&#8217;t want people to lose sight of that.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYPD Blue Fines &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4714</link>
		<dc:creator>NYPD Blue Fines &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4714</guid>
		<description>[...] NYPD Blue&#160;Fines  This posting earlier slammed FCC Commissioner Tate for being a petty fascist. FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NYPD Blue&nbsp;Fines  This posting earlier slammed FCC Commissioner Tate for being a petty fascist. FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4709</guid>
		<description>Point well taken...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point well taken&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4701</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4701</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s assuming you believe he is really her son - which I admit I didn&#039;t believe. I was really just trying to draw attention to the fact that his comment didn&#039;t add anything to the debate. If he believes the FCC should be able to limit television content to such great lengths, he could have at least made an effort to prove his point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s assuming you believe he is really her son &#8211; which I admit I didn&#8217;t believe. I was really just trying to draw attention to the fact that his comment didn&#8217;t add anything to the debate. If he believes the FCC should be able to limit television content to such great lengths, he could have at least made an effort to prove his point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyberlaw Central &#187; Blawg Review #144</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyberlaw Central &#187; Blawg Review #144</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>[...] Similarly, Professor Marc Randazza spares no language when he brands Deborah Taylor Tate of the FCC as &#8220;A$$hat of the Week.&amp;#8221... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Similarly, Professor Marc Randazza spares no language when he brands Deborah Taylor Tate of the FCC as &#8220;A$$hat of the Week.&amp;#8221&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcorandazza</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>marcorandazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Yeah, but my comments were a bit immature too... initially.  Plus, you can&#039;t fault a guy for sticking up for his mom.  -MJR&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Yeah, but my comments were a bit immature too&#8230; initially.  Plus, you can&#8217;t fault a guy for sticking up for his mom.  -MJR</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
