<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Commish Tate &#8212; Asshat of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>Occasionally Irreverent Thoughts on Law, Tech, and Politics by Prof. Marc J. Randazza</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: M Irvine</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>M Irvine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>with regards to the first post, what's wrong with full frontal nudity? please stay out of my household. I promise to stay out of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with regards to the first post, what&#8217;s wrong with full frontal nudity? please stay out of my household. I promise to stay out of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Gets Punked Again &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-6879</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Gets Punked Again &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-6879</guid>
		<description>[...] to me as a First Amendment advocate, but it also has the right tone when considered in light of Deborah Taylor Tate’s recent statement that “the law is simple. If a broadcaster makes the decision to show indecent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to me as a First Amendment advocate, but it also has the right tone when considered in light of Deborah Taylor Tate’s recent statement that “the law is simple. If a broadcaster makes the decision to show indecent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Arndt</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4988</link>
		<dc:creator>George Arndt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4988</guid>
		<description>The FCC only regulates broadcast TV and radio, both which are in decline. Anyone with an internet or cable connections can see a LOT of nudity and foul language. The FCC is a paper tiger in the end. They are completely out of touch with new trends in culture. The attitudes about sexuality and nudity in the US are becoming more like Europe’s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC only regulates broadcast TV and radio, both which are in decline. Anyone with an internet or cable connections can see a LOT of nudity and foul language. The FCC is a paper tiger in the end. They are completely out of touch with new trends in culture. The attitudes about sexuality and nudity in the US are becoming more like Europe’s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYPD Blue Update &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4793</link>
		<dc:creator>NYPD Blue Update &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4793</guid>
		<description>[...] Blue&#160;Update  An update to my post, FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week (which has, itself been updated) here is the scene that got ABC a $1.4 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blue&nbsp;Update  An update to my post, FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week (which has, itself been updated) here is the scene that got ABC a $1.4 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Nichol - First Amendment Bad Ass &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4768</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Nichol - First Amendment Bad Ass &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4768</guid>
		<description>[...] only Deborah Taylor Tate, Sam Brownback, and a certain uptight trademark examiner (who will not be named during ongoing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only Deborah Taylor Tate, Sam Brownback, and a certain uptight trademark examiner (who will not be named during ongoing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcorandazza</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>marcorandazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Do I need to draw you a picture?  

Have someone take a picture of your ass.  See the fleshy parts?  Those are your &lt;i&gt;buttocks&lt;/i&gt;.  The little hole where the poop comes out is the &lt;i&gt;anus&lt;/i&gt;.  If you wish to consider the anus to be a sexual organ, I suppose that there is an argument in your favor.  The buttocks are as much a sexual organ as the biceps.   

Naturally, I presume that Ms. Taylor Tate and the Kansas board of education would say that this is only a theory.

And why do I use "asshat?"  Asshat and asshole are not synonymous, asshole.  

-MJR&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Do I need to draw you a picture?  </p>
<p>Have someone take a picture of your ass.  See the fleshy parts?  Those are your <i>buttocks</i>.  The little hole where the poop comes out is the <i>anus</i>.  If you wish to consider the anus to be a sexual organ, I suppose that there is an argument in your favor.  The buttocks are as much a sexual organ as the biceps.   </p>
<p>Naturally, I presume that Ms. Taylor Tate and the Kansas board of education would say that this is only a theory.</p>
<p>And why do I use &#8220;asshat?&#8221;  Asshat and asshole are not synonymous, asshole.  </p>
<p>-MJR</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbk</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4737</link>
		<dc:creator>sbk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4737</guid>
		<description>With the acceptance of homosexuality by the American culture how is it that the "buttocks" are NOT a sexual organ?  My dictionary uses "anus" as a synonym for "butt."  

It also begs the question if the human asshole is so unoffense to the public, why do you use the term "Asshat?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the acceptance of homosexuality by the American culture how is it that the &#8220;buttocks&#8221; are NOT a sexual organ?  My dictionary uses &#8220;anus&#8221; as a synonym for &#8220;butt.&#8221;  </p>
<p>It also begs the question if the human asshole is so unoffense to the public, why do you use the term &#8220;Asshat?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Proposes Fine of $1.4 Mil for Showing Buttocks &#171; Entertainment Law</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Proposes Fine of $1.4 Mil for Showing Buttocks &#171; Entertainment Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>[...] also, my other good buddy Marco Randazza&#8217;s post here.     Posted by ajcontiguglia Filed in First [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also, my other good buddy Marco Randazza&#8217;s post here.     Posted by ajcontiguglia Filed in First [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcorandazza</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator>marcorandazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4719</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Of course, she is an evil little fascist... I just didn't want people to lose sight of that.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Of course, she is an evil little fascist&#8230; I just didn&#8217;t want people to lose sight of that.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYPD Blue Fines &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/deborah-taylor-tate-asshat-of-the-week/#comment-4714</link>
		<dc:creator>NYPD Blue Fines &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randazza.wordpress.com/?p=531#comment-4714</guid>
		<description>[...] NYPD Blue&#160;Fines  This posting earlier slammed FCC Commissioner Tate for being a petty fascist. FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NYPD Blue&nbsp;Fines  This posting earlier slammed FCC Commissioner Tate for being a petty fascist. FCC Commish Tate — Asshat of the Week [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
