Massachusetts Proposes Nanny-State Online Gambling Law

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick has proposed a new law to make criminals out of citizens who place bets online. (source) What makes this proposed law suspect to me is that it is buried deep within proposed legislation that would legalize land-based casinos in the Bay State.

Patrick’s provision, which is described in three paragraphs of the bill, applies to anyone in Massachusetts who places or receives a wager of any type using a telephone, cellphone, Internet, or local wireless networks. It also applies to anyone who knowingly installs equipment for transmitting wagers. The provision also specifically exempts the proposed casinos from the law. (source)

This certainly makes it look like Governor Patrick is giving the three proposed casinos a sweetheart deal. The bill prompted “Bad Cop News” to declare Governor Patrick as “crazed.” (source) Although I agree with the sentiment, I’m not sure that I agree that Gov. Patrick is “crazed.” It seems quite bright — package up a sweetheart bill legalizing a profitable enterprise while making its competition illegal. Crazed? More like machiavellian brilliance.

Ultimately, it seems that Barney Frank is a true voice of reason when it comes to online gambling:

“I believe in personal liberty,” Frank said. “Adults should be able to do what they want. I wish my fellow liberals would not be so inconsistent on this issue.” (source)

I have news for Congressman Frank. The old labels of “liberal” and “conservative” don’t fit anymore. So-called liberals seem to believe in liberty, as long as nobody uses that liberty to offend them (or their donors).

Conservatives say that they stand for less government intrusion in our lives, and the Republican party is the political home of the conservatives. Yet, the Republicans want to intrude into our personal lives to a degree that would make Stalin blush.

I consider myself to be “liberal,” but I usually find myself shunned by other liberals, while being embraced by conservatives. It makes me feel very confused when the only people who seem to like me are people who do not agree with me.

4 Responses to Massachusetts Proposes Nanny-State Online Gambling Law

  1. [...] Massachusetts Proposes Nanny-State Online Gambling Law [...]

  2. itsme2003 says:

    I classify myself as being moderately conservative. For many years it has been my observation that liberals are less tolerant than conservatives in the following way: Liberals claim to be tolerant of all viewpoints, but they can be extremely intolerant of viewpoints that differ from theirs. This comes across as hypocrisy. Conservatives make no such claim about being tolerant, so they don’t dissapoint. They’re not accepting of the other viewpoints, but it’s what you expected, so it’s less disappointing.

  3. JR Cohen says:

    A major flaw in Governor Patrick’s casino bill: it criminalizes on-line poker.

  4. [...] sure that Dixie and Utah aren’t the only places where personal liberty is no longer a right. Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick is working on a nanny state anti-gambling law. That one particularly galls me as a native [...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,695 other followers

%d bloggers like this: