This entry was posted on Thursday, April 12th, 2007 at 1:32 pm and is filed under First Amendment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
This entry was posted on Thursday, April 12th, 2007 at 1:32 pm and is filed under First Amendment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
By RSS Feed
Sexual Intelligence
Underdog Blog
Meeting the Sin Laws
TTABlog
Seattle Trademark Lawyer
Trademark Blog
Media Law
Mass. Law Blog
Law of the Land
Dillsnap Cogitations
Above the Law
Adams Drafting
Spam Notes
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
WindyPundit
Nobody's Business
Simple Justice
Build a Solo Practice
New York Personal Injury Law Blog
Pope Hat
Tatiana Von Tauber
QuizLaw
Citizen Media Project
Tech & Marketing Blog
Andrew Sullivan
What About Clients?
A Public Defender
Defending People
Likelihood of Confusion
ContiFazz
Defend My Domain
Dispatches From the Culture Wars
Siouxsie Law
Theme Contempt by Vault9.
Blog at WordPress.com.
April 6, 2009 at 7:44 am |
Was Imus gross? Yes.
Should he be fired — for business reasons? Maybe.
IS what he said constitutionally protected? Well, that may well *depend.*
What I mean is that it depends on the constitutional standard applied. If we apply the widely accepted notion of the meaning of free speech, then yes, it is. However, if we think about the countless cases in which it has been ruled that shouting “Fire!” falsely in a public place is *not* constitutionally defended, then it’s probably not.
Imus’ ignorant utterances might, conceivably, have started a riot somewhere.
In any case, if his bosses think the only way for him to make any lucre for them is to be offensive, then maybe THEY need a new business model.
In fairness to them, people who eat that stuff up need to get a life.